IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Sordillo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Exeter NE-Prep 28 13 13 26 0.929 0.1791 0.1791 0.4249 0.4249
2022-23 Northern Cyclones NCDC 50 14 16 30 0.600 0.1387 0.1365 0.4852 0.4773
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 30 7 13 20 0.667
2024-25 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 29 5 3 8 0.276
2023-24 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SO 22 2 1 3 0.136
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2023-24 · Hamilton
+3.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
20%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15213
Forward overall
#743
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stefan Decosse
SUNY Geneseo · 2006-07
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Voisin
SUNY Potsdam · 2007-08
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Zach Bettmeng
Becker · 2017-18
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.