← New Search ↗ Social Card

John King Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-12-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier 43 6 9 15 0.349 0.0456 0.0456 0.1184 0.1184
2020-21 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier 40 4 14 18 0.450 0.0589 0.0589 0.1527 0.1527
2021-22 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier 35 2 5 7 0.200 0.0262 0.0266 0.0679 0.0689
2022-23 Protec Jr. Ducks EHL 45 6 18 24 0.533 0.1232 0.1225 0.2609 0.2594
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC GR 25 6 4 10 0.400
2024-25 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC SR 8 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC JR 11 0 3 3 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2023-24 · Lebanon Valley
+278.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
12%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38875
Forward overall
#2405
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2006-07
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2011-12
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.