← New Search ↗ Social Card

John King Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-12-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier 43 6 9 15 0.349 0.0393 0.0393 0.1187 0.1187
2020-21 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier 40 4 14 18 0.450 0.0508 0.0508 0.1531 0.1531
2021-22 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier 35 2 5 7 0.200 0.0226 0.0229 0.0680 0.0690
2022-23 Protec Jr. Ducks EHL 45 6 18 24 0.533 0.0780 0.0776 0.2615 0.2600
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC GR 25 6 4 10 0.400
2024-25 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC SR 8 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC JR 11 0 3 3 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2023-24 · Lebanon Valley
+471.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38442
Forward overall
#2382
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2006-07
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Colby · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2011-12
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.