IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brock Labelle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-01-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 46 9 18 27 0.587 0.1439 0.1427 0.4037 0.4002
2011-12 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 48 10 25 35 0.729 0.1787 0.1693 0.5015 0.4750
2012-13 Michigan Warriors NAHL 58 8 13 21 0.362 0.1287 0.1184 0.3819 0.3515
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Castleton D3 LittleEast SR 27 9 16 25 0.926
2015-16 Castleton D3 LittleEast JR 10 0 1 1 0.100
2014-15 Castleton D3 LittleEast SO 16 1 3 4 0.250
2013-14 Castleton D3 LittleEast FR 17 1 5 6 0.353
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2013-14 · Castleton
+197.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#32349
Forward overall
#1220
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lane Boswell
Marian · 2007-08
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Danny Rock
SUNY Brockport · 2016-17
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeremy Quesnel
SUNY Potsdam · 2021-22
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.