← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lane Boswell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-01-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2005-06 Calgary Canucks AJHL 41 4 1 5 0.122 0.0405 0.0408 0.1131 0.1139
2006-07 AJHL 56 7 11 18 0.321 0.1066 0.1025 0.2979 0.2864
2007-08 AJHL 53 12 17 29 0.547 0.1816 0.1645 0.5071 0.4595
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Marian D3 NCHA SR 24 1 0 1 0.042
2010-11 Marian D3 NCHA JR 26 6 8 14 0.538
2009-10 Marian D3 SO 26 2 17 19 0.731
2008-09 Marian D3 FR 28 11 7 18 0.643
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2008-09 · Marian
+437.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#41335
Forward overall
#1344
Forward born in 1987
#1893
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2014-15
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2007-08
0.828 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.