← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicholas Lepone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-02-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Vaughan Vipers OJHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2011-12 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 46 9 14 23 0.500 0.1226 0.1289 0.3442 0.3620
2012-13 — OJHL 53 13 10 23 0.434 0.1064 0.1066 0.2987 0.2992
2013-14 Pickering Panthers OJHL 50 20 24 44 0.880 0.2157 0.2051 0.6057 0.5758
2014-15 — OJHL 50 25 27 52 1.040 0.2549 0.2292 0.7158 0.6435
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Canton D3 SUNYAC SO 10 2 2 4 0.400
2015-16 Canton D3 SUNYAC FR 25 7 4 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2015-16 · Canton
+134.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21140
Forward overall
#810
Forward born in 1994
#870
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2021-22
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2024-25
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.