icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Vaughan Vipers | OJHL | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2011-12 | St. Michael's Buzzers | OJHL | 46 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 0.500 | 0.1397 | 0.1469 | 0.3451 | 0.3629 |
| 2012-13 | — | OJHL | 53 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 0.434 | 0.1213 | 0.1215 | 0.2995 | 0.3000 |
| 2013-14 | Pickering Panthers | OJHL | 50 | 20 | 24 | 44 | 0.880 | 0.2459 | 0.2338 | 0.6073 | 0.5773 |
| 2014-15 | — | OJHL | 50 | 25 | 27 | 52 | 1.040 | 0.2906 | 0.2612 | 0.7177 | 0.6452 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Canton | D3 | — | SO | 10 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.400 |
| 2015-16 | Canton | D3 | — | FR | 25 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 0.440 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.