IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rob Turville Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-02-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 58 24 23 47 0.810 0.2706 0.2735 0.7522 0.7602
2003-04 Vernon Vipers BCHL 16 4 6 10 0.625 0.2432 0.2335 0.9114 0.8749
2004-05 Vernon Vipers BCHL 25 3 5 8 0.320 0.1245 0.1137 0.4667 0.4262
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — SR 28 6 6 12 0.429
2007-08 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — JR 27 4 8 12 0.444
2006-07 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — SO 11 2 7 9 0.818
2005-06 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — FR 26 8 4 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2005-06 · Wisconsin-Superior
+233.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17992
Forward overall
#610
Forward born in 1984

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

James Ring
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dakota Mason
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2012-13
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brock Krulicki
SUNY Oswego · 2022-23
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.