← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vincent Gould Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Dexter NE-Prep 30 6 5 11 0.367 0.0726 0.0726 0.1671 0.1671
2019-20 Dexter NE-Prep 30 6 8 14 0.467 0.0925 0.0925 0.2126 0.2126
2021-22 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 47 14 8 22 0.468 0.1908 0.1962 0.3763 0.3870
2022-23 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 50 21 24 45 0.900 0.3669 0.3620 0.7234 0.7137
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 17 4 8 12 0.706
2024-25 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 11 1 2 3 0.273
2023-24 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SO 9 1 1 2 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2023-24 · Hamilton
-12.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
10%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10802
Forward overall
#478
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2009-10
0.950 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2003-04
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.