IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Panet Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1981-03-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Wexford Raiders OJHL 43 22 19 41 0.954 0.2337 0.2157 0.6565 0.6060
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 28 6 6 12 0.429
2003-04 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 22 12 9 21 0.955
2002-03 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 25 5 9 14 0.560
2001-02 Lake Forest D3 NCHA FR 16 6 6 12 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2001-02 · Lake Forest
+306.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17440
Forward overall
#501
Forward born in 1981
#617
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Will Soloway
Colby · 2022-23
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kelby Lorenz
Southern Maine · 2011-12
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Vassallo
SUNY Oswego · 2022-23
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.