IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carter Diceman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-08-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Toronto Patriots OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Toronto Patriots OJHL 52 18 22 40 0.769 0.1885 0.1852 0.5265 0.5172
2022-23 Collingwood Blues OJHL 48 14 21 35 0.729 0.1787 0.1664 0.4991 0.4647
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Geneseo D3 — JR 27 12 12 24 0.889
2024-25 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SO 29 9 11 20 0.690
2023-24 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC FR 19 0 1 1 0.053
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.05
2023-24 · SUNY Geneseo
-64.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24600
Forward overall
#1376
Forward born in 2002
#1137
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Liam Lawson
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2016-17
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Mead
Becker · 2018-19
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Orn
Saint John's · 2015-16
0.438 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.