IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Gerebi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-06-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Chanhassen USHS-MN 19 1 4 5 0.263 0.0324 0.0324 0.0639 0.0639
2021-22 Chanhassen USHS-MN 24 1 9 10 0.417 0.0513 0.0513 0.1012 0.1012
2022-23 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 50 2 7 9 0.180 0.0416 0.0417 0.1455 0.1457
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Middlebury D3 NESCAC JR 5 1 0 1 0.200
2023-24 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SO 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
55%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17402
Defenseman overall
#3122
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt McCann
Norwich · 2007-08
0.632 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bekk McClaine
Chatham · 2021-22
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Kelly
Saint John's · 2013-14
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.