IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan James Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-07-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Espanola Paper Kings NOJHL 37 1 8 9 0.243 0.0346 0.0337 0.1009 0.0981
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC — 24 1 1 2 0.083
2025-26 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC GR 24 1 1 2 0.083
2024-25 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC — 16 2 1 3 0.188
2024-25 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SR 16 2 1 3 0.188
2023-24 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC — 16 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC JR 16 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24487
Defenseman overall
#3688
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

David Van Iterson
UMass Boston · 2023-24
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan White
Stonehill · 2017-18
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dustin Trail
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2006-07
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.