IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

A.J. Lackas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-07-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Henderson Force USPHL-Premier 40 11 4 15 0.375 0.0490 0.0490 0.1273 0.1273
2021-22 New England Wolves EHL 44 10 18 28 0.636 0.1470 0.1580 0.3114 0.3347
2022-23 New England Wolves EHL 26 15 13 28 1.077 0.2488 0.2545 0.5269 0.5390
2023-24 New England Wolves EHL 45 21 32 53 1.178 0.2721 0.2646 0.5763 0.5604
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC SO 21 1 1 2 0.095
2024-25 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC — 11 1 0 1 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2024-25 · Albertus Magnus
-59.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11680
Forward overall
#529
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Garrett Hallford
Trine · 2017-18
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Zeke Hume
Manhattanville · 2003-04
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Sheehan
Framingham State · 2015-16
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.