| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Navan Grads | CCHL | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.125 | 0.0271 | 0.0260 | 0.0967 | 0.0927 |
| 2023-24 | — | CCHL | 36 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 0.194 | 0.0422 | 0.0382 | 0.1504 | 0.1362 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Southern New Hampshire | D2 | NE10 | — | 22 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 0.409 |
| 2024-25 | Southern New Hampshire | D2 | NE10 | — | 28 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0.179 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.