← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Dustin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-12-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 New Jersey 87's EHL 44 6 13 19 0.432 0.0997 0.1039 0.2113 0.2202
2023-24 New Jersey 87's EHL 45 16 15 31 0.689 0.1591 0.1578 0.3371 0.3344
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 5 18 23 0.676
2024-25 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC 20 2 2 4 0.200
2024-25 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 5 18 23 0.676
2023-24 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 5 18 23 0.676
2022-23 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 5 18 23 0.676
2021-22 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 5 18 23 0.676
2020-21 Ohio University ACHA_D1 34 5 18 23 0.676

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27869
Forward overall
#1594
Forward born in 2003
#790
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2024-25
0.393 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2014-15
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.