← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nik Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-12-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Academy of Holy Angels USHS-MN 21 0 1 1 0.048 0.0059 0.0059 0.0116 0.0116
2020-21 Academy of Holy Angels USHS-MN 19 6 6 12 0.632 0.0778 0.0778 0.1534 0.1534
2021-22 Academy of Holy Angels USHS-MN 26 16 11 27 1.038 0.1279 0.1279 0.2521 0.2521
2022-23 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 43 6 8 14 0.326 0.0360 0.0365 0.1028 0.1041
2023-24 NA3HL 47 15 26 41 0.872 0.0965 0.0931 0.2754 0.2657
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Beloit D3 WIAC SO 23 1 4 5 0.217
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2025-26 · Beloit
+260.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31726
Forward overall
#1881
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Becker · 2012-13
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.