← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gunner Vignaroli Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-12-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Florida Jr. Blades USPHL-Elite 13 1 1 2 0.154 0.0142 0.0158 0.0352 0.0393
2021-22 USPHL-Premier 31 1 2 3 0.097 0.0127 0.0129 0.0329 0.0333
2022-23 USPHL-Premier 15 2 8 10 0.667 0.0872 0.0840
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 31 2 9 11 0.355
2024-25 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 31 2 9 11 0.355
2023-24 Salem State D3 MASCAC 5 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 31 2 9 11 0.355
2022-23 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 31 2 9 11 0.355
2021-22 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 31 2 9 11 0.355
2020-21 Waldorf University ACHA_D1 31 2 9 11 0.355
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.01
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2020-21 · Waldorf University
+2281.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14769
Defenseman overall
#2745
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gustavus Adolphus · 2022-23
0.294 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2014-15
0.074 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2009-10
0.188 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.