IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brennen Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-12-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Melville Millionaires SJHL 55 9 16 25 0.455 0.1164 0.1181 0.3420 0.3469
2015-16 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 34 9 10 19 0.559 0.1985 0.1926 0.5894 0.5718
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D1 BigTen SR 27 10 7 17 0.630
2019-20 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SR 27 10 7 17 0.630
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D1 BigTen JR 30 7 9 16 0.533
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen JR 30 7 9 16 0.533
2017-18 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SO 30 10 5 15 0.500
2016-17 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen FR 27 1 1 2 0.074
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2016-17 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
-46.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30292
Forward overall
#1198
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Aucoin
Southern Maine · 2024-25
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Pryce
Buffalo State · 2012-13
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dante Zapata
Utica · 2018-19
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.