IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Logan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-12-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Cleveland Jr. Lumberjacks NA3HL 15 2 2 4 0.267 0.0335 0.0367 0.0842 0.0923
2013-14 Cleveland Jr. Lumberjacks NA3HL 45 17 9 26 0.578 0.0725 0.0767 0.1824 0.1929
2014-15 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 7 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 Carolina Jr. Hurricanes USPHL-Elite 44 29 32 61 1.386 0.1280 0.1241 0.3175 0.3078
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Wilkes D1 MAC JR 14 6 5 11 0.786
2018-19 Wilkes D3 MAC — 14 6 5 11 0.786
2017-18 Aurora D3 NCHA — 21 6 7 13 0.619
2016-17 Aurora D3 NCHA — 24 7 3 10 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2016-17 · Aurora
+341.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33872
Forward overall
#1380
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Taylor Murphy
Westfield State · 2009-10
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Annunziato
Lake Forest · 2011-12
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wyatt Wurst
St. Scholastica · 2023-24
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.