← New Search ↗ Social Card

Myles Douglas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-08-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits USPHL-Premier 40 2 3 5 0.125 0.0141 0.0147 0.0425 0.0444
2022-23 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits USPHL-Premier 43 10 12 22 0.512 0.0577 0.0575 0.1740 0.1733
2023-24 Express Hockey Club EHL 36 3 3 6 0.167 0.0244 0.0238 0.0817 0.0796
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC 25 0 0 0 0.000
2025-26 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC 25 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC 25 2 1 3 0.120
2024-25 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC 25 2 1 3 0.120
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2024-25 · Morrisville
+276.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#48804
Forward overall
#3265
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2003-04
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2007-08
0.188 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnson & Wales · 2011-12
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.