IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-04-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.0770 0.0836 0.2695 0.2927
2022-23 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 32 4 6 10 0.312 0.0722 0.0754 0.2527 0.2638
2023-24 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 46 8 13 21 0.457 0.1055 0.1042 0.3691 0.3644
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nazareth D3 UCHC SO 22 0 3 3 0.136
2024-25 Nazareth D3 UCHC — 15 1 0 1 0.067
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2024-25 · Nazareth
-23.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
25%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5514
Defenseman overall
#1399
Defenseman born in 2004
#801
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adam Scuglia
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2009-10
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Eckenrod
Western New England · 2014-15
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Drew Anderson
Augsburg · 2012-13
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.