IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Eckenrod Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Rockland Nationals CCHL 28 3 6 9 0.321 0.1026 0.0989 0.2488 0.2398
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Western New England D1 — SR 22 1 2 3 0.136
2018-19 Western New England D3 CNE SR 22 1 2 3 0.136
2017-18 Western New England D3 CNE JR 21 0 1 1 0.048
2016-17 Western New England D3 CNE SO 17 1 4 5 0.294
2015-16 Western New England D3 CNE FR 22 1 7 8 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2015-16 · Western New England
+329.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#46057
Forward overall
#1981
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Mike Robinson
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ New Hampshire
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Conor Landrigan
Utica · 2015-16
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Papayoanou
Southern Maine · 2015-16
0.192 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Janis Zemitis
Elmira · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.