IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Janis Zemitis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-03-23 Country: Latvia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Connecticut Jr. Rangers USPHL-Premier 44 31 20 51 1.159 0.3820 0.3921 0.3943 0.4047
2018-19 — NCDC 35 6 8 14 0.400 0.2230 0.2184 0.3234 0.3168
2019-20 — NAHL 49 7 6 13 0.265 0.1051 0.1051 0.2785 0.2785
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Elmira D3 UCHC SR 28 18 16 34 1.214
2022-23 Elmira D3 UCHC JR 24 7 8 15 0.625
2021-22 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 27 15 13 28 1.037
2020-21 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 15 5 4 9 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2020-21 · Elmira
+143.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
48%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27299
Forward overall
#1411
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aaron Ryback
Concordia · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Bloem
SUNY Potsdam · 2017-18
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Williams
St. Thomas · 2008-09
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.