IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Kimball Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-04-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Powell River Kings BCHL 56 15 13 28 0.500 0.1926 0.1968 0.7277 0.7435
2018-19 Powell River Kings BCHL 42 8 13 21 0.500 0.1926 0.1864 0.7277 0.7042
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC — 26 5 7 12 0.462
2021-22 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC — 20 1 4 5 0.250
2019-20 Bowdoin D1 NESCAC FR 22 9 7 16 0.727
2019-20 Bowdoin D3 NESCAC — 22 9 7 16 0.727
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2019-20 · Bowdoin
+345.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30545
Forward overall
#1615
Forward born in 1999
#1683
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carter Newpower
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2021-22
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Vincent Paquette
Adrian · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Henderson
Marian · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.