← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Perry Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-11-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Fort Wayne Spacemen USPHL-Premier 22 7 5 12 0.545 0.0714 0.0714 0.1851 0.1851
2020-21 Fort Wayne Spacemen USPHL-Premier 31 4 3 7 0.226 0.0295 0.0295 0.0766 0.0766
2021-22 Fort Wayne Spacemen USPHL-Premier 11 3 1 4 0.364 0.0476 0.0481 0.1234 0.1247
2022-23 Fort Wayne Spacemen USPHL-Premier 36 11 17 28 0.778 0.1017 0.0977 0.2640 0.2537
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Misericordia D3 MAC JR 17 0 1 1 0.059
2024-25 Misericordia D3 MAC 19 0 1 1 0.053
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.05
2024-25 · Misericordia
-21.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33080
Forward overall
#1970
Forward born in 2002
#2717
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Post · 2016-17
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2013-14
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2011-12
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.