IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Carmen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-12-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Elite 29 15 21 36 1.241 0.0925 0.0925 0.2844 0.2844
2021-22 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier 41 8 19 27 0.658 0.0743 0.0791 0.2240 0.2384
2022-23 New York Apple Core EHL 39 4 9 13 0.333 0.0488 0.0509 0.1634 0.1706
2023-24 New York Apple Core EHL 28 2 5 7 0.250 0.0366 0.0364 0.1226 0.1218
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Manhattanville D3 UCHC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#41106
Forward overall
#2605
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Blackmon
St. Scholastica · 2005-06
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Reynolds
Massachusetts College · 2009-10
0.150 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Simmons
SUNY Brockport · 2006-07
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.