← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Baun Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-05-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1226 0.1357 0.3443 0.3810
2009-10 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 45 5 10 15 0.333 0.0817 0.0861 0.2295 0.2419
2010-11 Cornwall Colts CCHL 56 19 23 42 0.750 0.1627 0.1644 0.5803 0.5862
2011-12 Cornwall Colts CCHL 42 29 32 61 1.452 0.3150 0.3021 1.1237 1.0776
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 38 14 15 29 0.763
2013-14 Colgate D1 ECAC SO 39 11 15 26 0.667
2012-13 Colgate D1 ECAC FR 36 14 10 24 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2012-13 · Colgate
+215.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15236
Forward overall
#571
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.36 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Morrisville · 2013-14
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2023-24
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2017-18
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.