IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Baun Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-05-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1502 0.1662 0.3422 0.3787
2009-10 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 45 5 10 15 0.333 0.1001 0.1055 0.2281 0.2404
2010-11 Cornwall Colts CCHL 56 19 23 42 0.750 0.2395 0.2420 0.5806 0.5865
2011-12 Cornwall Colts CCHL 42 29 32 61 1.452 0.4638 0.4448 1.1243 1.0781
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Colgate D1 ECAC JR 38 14 15 29 0.763
2013-14 Colgate D1 ECAC SO 39 11 15 26 0.667
2012-13 Colgate D1 ECAC FR 36 14 10 24 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2012-13 · Colgate
+114.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14777
Forward overall
#556
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Robbie Payne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Heinonen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Phil Marinaccio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Biggs
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jared Linnell
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Catanzaro
SUNY Cortland · 2002-03
0.958 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brody Simko
Trine · 2023-24
1.214 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor Brown
Amherst · 2011-12
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.