IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Bartlett Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier 28 6 8 14 0.500 0.0564 0.0545 0.1701 0.1643
2023-24 Pennsylvania Huntsmen EHL 37 3 8 11 0.297 0.0435 0.0411 0.1458 0.1377
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC FR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2008-09 Castleton D3 — SR 25 3 13 16 0.640
2007-08 Castleton D3 — JR 25 3 5 8 0.320
2006-07 Castleton D3 — SO 27 6 16 22 0.815
2005-06 Castleton D3 — FR 25 2 9 11 0.440
2001-02 Cornell D1 ECAC-W SR 28 2 5 7 0.250
2000-01 Cornell D1 ECAC-W JR 23 0 4 4 0.174

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#40518
Forward overall
#2547
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Dauphinais
Wisconsin-Superior · 2022-23
0.263 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Montambault
Adrian · 2017-18
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Setter
Wisconsin-Superior · 2023-24
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.