IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

James Evans Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-05-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Brewster NE-Prep 28 2 0 2 0.071 0.0201 0.0201 0.0327 0.0327
2022-23 Brewster NE-Prep 28 11 13 24 0.857 0.2418 0.2418 0.3922 0.3922
2023-24 Seacoast Spartans EHL 42 5 5 10 0.238 0.0838 0.0848 0.1167 0.1181
2024-25 Boston Dukes EHL 44 5 11 16 0.364 0.1280 0.1230 0.1783 0.1713
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. John Fisher D3 UCHC FR 16 5 3 8 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2025-26 · St. John Fisher
+442.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38591
Forward overall
#2438
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nathaniel Bannister
Adrian · 2024-25
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jesse Galassi
Curry · 2021-22
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ricardo Yesue
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2006-07
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.