IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gavin Simon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-04-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Monticello USHS-MN 31 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Monticello USHS-MN 19 1 3 4 0.210 0.0266 0.0266 0.0511 0.0511
2021-22 Monticello USHS-MN 31 7 19 26 0.839 0.1062 0.1062 0.2037 0.2037
2022-23 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 42 3 9 12 0.286 0.0359 0.0369 0.0902 0.0927
2023-24 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 39 3 9 12 0.308 0.0386 0.0378 0.0971 0.0951
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 — 25 1 5 6 0.240
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2025-26 · Southern New Hampshire
+579.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
22%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16431
Defenseman overall
#3085
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stephen Kelly
Buffalo State · 2014-15
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Coady
Southern New Hampshire · 2018-19
0.130 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Beaulac
Post · 2022-23
0.118 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.