← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brock Edwards Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-12-08 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Queen's Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Collingwood Blues OJHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2010-11 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 53 11 25 36 0.679 0.1473 0.1532 0.5255 0.5466
2011-12 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 59 28 41 69 1.169 0.2537 0.2509 0.9048 0.8947
2012-13 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 62 19 33 52 0.839 0.1819 0.1718 0.6489 0.6130
2016-17 Queen's Univ. USports-M 20 2 1 3 0.150 0.0791 0.0750 0.4396 0.4169
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Niagara D1 AHA JR 11 0 4 4 0.364
2014-15 Niagara D1 AHA SO 24 2 5 7 0.292
2013-14 Niagara D1 AHA 26 5 9 14 0.538
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2013-14 · Niagara
+209.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27255
Forward overall
#1016
Forward born in 1992

D2/3 Comparables

Aurora · 2024-25
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2009-10
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.