| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Collingwood Blues | OJHL | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2010-11 | Carleton Place Canadians | CCHL | 53 | 11 | 25 | 36 | 0.679 | 0.1473 | 0.1532 | 0.5255 | 0.5466 |
| 2011-12 | Carleton Place Canadians | CCHL | 59 | 28 | 41 | 69 | 1.169 | 0.2537 | 0.2509 | 0.9048 | 0.8947 |
| 2012-13 | Carleton Place Canadians | CCHL | 62 | 19 | 33 | 52 | 0.839 | 0.1819 | 0.1718 | 0.6489 | 0.6130 |
| 2016-17 | Queen's Univ. | USports-M | 20 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.150 | 0.0791 | 0.0750 | 0.4396 | 0.4169 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Niagara | D1 | AHA | JR | 11 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.364 |
| 2014-15 | Niagara | D1 | AHA | SO | 24 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.292 |
| 2013-14 | Niagara | D1 | AHA | — | 26 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 0.538 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.