IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Devin Shore Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-07-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 41 29 29 58 1.415 0.4249 0.4562 0.9683 1.0397
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 39 14 21 35 0.897
2013-14 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 35 14 29 43 1.229
2012-13 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 38 6 20 26 0.684
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.39
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2012-13 · Maine
+75.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7753
Forward overall
#357
Forward born in 1994
#106
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Hudson Fasching
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.75 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Connor Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Weis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Avery Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
Karson Kuhlman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chad Merrell
New England · 2015-16
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Michaud
Trinity · 2014-15
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Aiello
UMass Dartmouth · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.