IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Aiello Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-04-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 42 8 10 18 0.429 0.1050 0.1140 0.2951 0.3205
2005-06 Ajax Attack OJHL 44 14 33 47 1.068 0.2618 0.2747 0.7355 0.7718
2006-07 Ajax Attack OJHL 7 1 0 1 0.143 0.0350 0.0350 0.0984 0.0983
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 UMass Dartmouth D3 ECAC SO 1 0 0 0 0.000
2003-04 UMass Dartmouth D3 ECAC FR 4 3 1 4 1.000

NCAAe Rankings

#22530
Forward overall
#791
Forward born in 1988
#965
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Maddox Lizotte
Tufts · 2022-23
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Taddia
Salem State · 2022-23
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Szretter
University of New England · 2018-19
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.