icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | BB&N | NE-Prep | 22 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.136 | 0.0270 | 0.0270 | 0.0621 | 0.0621 |
| 2019-20 | Thayer Academy | NE-Prep | 27 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.111 | 0.0220 | 0.0220 | 0.0506 | 0.0506 |
| 2021-22 | Thayer Academy | NE-Prep | 20 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 0.450 | 0.0891 | 0.0891 | 0.2050 | 0.2050 |
| 2022-23 | Thayer Academy | NE-Prep | 25 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0.320 | 0.0634 | 0.0634 | 0.1458 | 0.1458 |
| 2023-24 | Boston Jr. Bruins | NCDC | 24 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.208 | 0.0849 | 0.0829 | 0.1674 | 0.1635 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Salem State | D3 | MASCAC | SO | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.333 |
| 2024-25 | Salem State | D3 | MASCAC | — | 13 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.308 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.