← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shane Taddia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-01-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 BB&N NE-Prep 22 3 0 3 0.136 0.0263 0.0263 0.0624 0.0624
2019-20 Thayer Academy NE-Prep 27 0 3 3 0.111 0.0214 0.0214 0.0508 0.0508
2021-22 Thayer Academy NE-Prep 20 5 4 9 0.450 0.0868 0.0868 0.2059 0.2059
2022-23 Thayer Academy NE-Prep 25 2 6 8 0.320 0.0617 0.0617 0.1464 0.1464
2023-24 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 24 1 4 5 0.208 0.0481 0.0470 0.1684 0.1645
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Salem State D3 MASCAC 6 1 1 2 0.333
2024-25 Salem State D3 MASCAC 13 2 2 4 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2024-25 · Salem State
+579.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
18%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#44380
Forward overall
#2959
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2000-01
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2015-16
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tufts · 2006-07
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.