IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Thomas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-01-17 Country: Canada
Maryville
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 50 2 5 7 0.140 0.0468 0.0469 0.1300 0.1303
2015-16 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 51 0 11 11 0.216 0.0720 0.0688 0.2002 0.1914
2016-17 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 58 3 15 18 0.310 0.1036 0.0940 0.2881 0.2614
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 St. Norbert D3 NCHA GR 31 0 9 9 0.290
2020-21 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 29 1 6 7 0.241
2018-19 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 31 1 2 3 0.097
2017-18 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 4 0 3 3 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2017-18 · St. Norbert
+847.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15267
Defenseman overall
#1998
Defenseman born in 1996
#2539
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ross Pavek
St. Norbert · 2012-13
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eddie Matsushima
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2014-15
0.536 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Barber
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2012-13
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.