IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Begg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Janesville Jets NAHL 59 13 16 29 0.491 0.1806 0.1858 0.5188 0.5337
2022-23 Janesville Jets NAHL 31 7 8 15 0.484 0.1778 0.1742 0.5108 0.5003
2023-24 Janesville Jets NAHL 55 11 25 36 0.654 0.2405 0.2241 0.6908 0.6437
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Norwich D3 LittleEast — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24497
Forward overall
#1352
Forward born in 2003
#1929
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Billy Foulds
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Grund
SUNY Brockport · 2021-22
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kerfalla Touré
Elmira · 2021-22
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.