IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Cooper Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-02-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Texas Tornado NAHL 35 1 12 13 0.371 0.1320 0.1336 0.3918 0.3967
2006-07 Texas Tornado NAHL 50 6 11 17 0.340 0.1208 0.1164 0.3586 0.3454
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Tufts D3 NESCAC SR 18 7 9 16 0.889
2009-10 Tufts D3 NESCAC JR 25 9 12 21 0.840
2008-09 Tufts D3 NESCAC SO 25 5 16 21 0.840
2007-08 Tufts D3 NESCAC FR 23 4 7 11 0.478
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2007-08 · Tufts
+353.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#38732
Forward overall
#1269
Forward born in 1987
#4010
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adam Gill
St. Mary's · 2003-04
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Board
Neumann · 2012-13
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Devlin O'Kane
SUNY Cortland · 2021-22
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.