IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Gill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-02-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 54 13 15 28 0.518 0.1905 0.1834 0.5473 0.5270
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SR 25 8 10 18 0.720
2006-07 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC JR 25 13 9 22 0.880
2005-06 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SO 24 15 13 28 1.167
2004-05 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 15 3 7 10 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2004-05 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+324.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27041
Forward overall
#779
Forward born in 1984
#2276
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ross Oldcorn
Manhattanville · 2000-01
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sébastien Poirier
Westfield State · 2009-10
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Glaesmer
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2005-06
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.