IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Sturtz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-09-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 9 0 2 2 0.222 0.0545 0.0590 0.1530 0.1656
2013-14 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 58 51 53 104 1.793 0.3889 0.3827 1.3873 1.3652
2014-15 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 58 30 42 72 1.241 0.2693 0.2526 0.9605 0.9009
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Penn State D1 BigTen JR 37 14 26 40 1.081
2016-17 Penn State D1 BigTen SO 37 22 15 37 1.000
2015-16 Penn State D1 BigTen FR 37 18 9 27 0.730
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2015-16 · Penn State
+179.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6616
Forward overall
#321
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Storjohann
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
James Willis
Manhattanville · 2000-01
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitchell Herlihey
SUNY Oswego · 2013-14
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.