← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Tugnutt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-05-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Peterborough Liftlock Stars OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Kemptville 73's CCHL 60 6 8 14 0.233 0.0506 0.0565 0.1805 0.2015
2013-14 Kemptville 73's CCHL 45 10 20 30 0.667 0.1446 0.1542 0.5158 0.5500
2014-15 Kemptville 73's CCHL 54 19 27 46 0.852 0.1848 0.1885 0.6591 0.6724
2015-16 Kemptville 73's CCHL 48 22 34 56 1.167 0.2531 0.2460 0.9027 0.8773
2016-17 Kemptville 73's CCHL 54 26 38 64 1.185 0.2571 0.2364 0.9170 0.8431
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Providence D1 HockeyEast SR 16 0 5 5 0.312
2019-20 Sacred Heart D1 AHA JR 31 14 16 30 0.968
2018-19 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SO 30 9 9 18 0.600
2017-18 Sacred Heart D1 AHA FR 36 7 17 24 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2017-18 · Sacred Heart
+224.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11994
Forward overall
#486
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2000-01
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2017-18
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2024-25
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.