IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryce Misley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-09-05 Country: Italy
2017 · Round 4, Pick #116  ·  Minnesota Wild Minnesota Wild
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Oakville Blades OJHL 53 19 20 39 0.736 0.1803 0.2024 0.5066 0.5686
2016-17 Oakville Blades OJHL 46 26 36 62 1.348 0.3303 0.3560 0.9280 1.0001
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SR 13 1 2 3 0.231
2019-20 Vermont D1 HockeyEast JR 34 5 5 10 0.294
2018-19 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SO 32 2 2 4 0.125
2017-18 Vermont D1 HockeyEast FR 30 0 5 5 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2017-18 · Vermont
-33.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13683
Forward overall
#622
Forward born in 1999
#380
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Karson Kuhlman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Galt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Hudson Fasching
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.75 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Connor Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Shane Eiserman
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lucas Michaud
Trinity · 2014-15
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Cannizzaro
Hobart · 2004-05
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Rodrigues
SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.