← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dean Taylor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-02-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Rockland Nationals CCHL 51 2 9 11 0.216 0.0689 0.0689 0.1670 0.1670
2020-21 Rockland Nationals CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Rockland Nationals CCHL 43 3 16 19 0.442 0.1411 0.1282 0.3421 0.3107
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Niagara ACHA_D1 28 5 17 22 0.786
2024-25 Niagara ACHA_D1 28 5 17 22 0.786
2023-24 Niagara ACHA_D1 28 5 17 22 0.786
2022-23 Niagara ACHA_D1 28 5 17 22 0.786
2021-22 Niagara ACHA_D1 28 5 17 22 0.786
2020-21 Niagara ACHA_D1 28 5 17 22 0.786

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15286
Defenseman overall
#2553
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aurora · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2009-10
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. John Fisher · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.