← New Search ↗ Social Card

Oliver Tarr Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-01-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 53 17 20 37 0.698 0.1711 0.1711 0.4806 0.4806
2020-21 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 52 33 37 70 1.346 0.3300 0.3147 0.9269 0.8839
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canisius D1 AHA SR 35 8 12 20 0.571
2024-25 Canisius D1 AHA JR 30 8 7 15 0.500
2023-24 Canisius D1 AHA SO 37 7 8 15 0.405
2022-23 Canisius D1 AHA FR 13 1 1 2 0.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2022-23 · Canisius
-42.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14060
Forward overall
#715
Forward born in 2002
#405
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Amherst · 2016-17
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2008-09
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2003-04
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.