IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Wilde Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-04-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 52 39 42 81 1.558 0.4679 0.4526 1.0662 1.0314
2022-23 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 52 42 44 86 1.654 0.4968 0.4552 1.1320 1.0371
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass D1 HockeyEast JR 22 1 3 4 0.182
2024-25 RIT D1 AHA — 27 18 14 32 1.185
2023-24 RIT D1 AHA — 40 19 16 35 0.875
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.39
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.88
2023-24 · RIT
+125.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5836
Forward overall
#259
Forward born in 2002
#41
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Morgan
New England · 2017-18
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Domsodi
Wentworth · 2010-11
1.250 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Zack Bross
UMass Boston · 2016-17
1.518 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.