← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Mallory Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-12-30 Country: Canada
Alvernia
MAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Milton Menace OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 OJHL 27 4 4 8 0.296 0.0726 0.0798 0.2040 0.2243
2023-24 Burlington Cougars OJHL 43 3 2 5 0.116 0.0285 0.0299 0.0801 0.0839
2024-25 Burlington Cougars OJHL 20 5 5 10 0.500 0.1226 0.1221 0.3443 0.3430
2025-26 OJHL 48 24 28 52 1.083 0.2655 0.2501 0.7459 0.7026
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27901
Forward overall
#1621
Forward born in 2005
#1376
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Alvernia Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.88
actual FR PPG at Alvernia
0.54
actual FR PPG at Alvernia
0.67
actual FR PPG at Alvernia
0.48
actual FR PPG at Alvernia

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2018-19
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2010-11
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2016-17
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.