IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Shannon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-10-15 Country: Canada
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Nichols
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 49 3 25 28 0.571 0.1401 0.1375 0.3934 0.3861
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
38%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8889
Defenseman overall
#1803
Defenseman born in 2006
#1854
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Nichols Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Zeke Costello
1.23
actual FR PPG at Nichols
Quinn McCarthy
0.00
actual FR PPG at Nichols
Petr Miko
0.35
actual FR PPG at Nichols
Curtis Carlson
0.56
actual FR PPG at Nichols

D2/3 Comparables

Dante Zapata
Utica · 2017-18
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Schneider
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
0.393 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Ehl
New England College · 2004-05
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.