IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Quinn McCarthy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-01-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 South Shore Kings NCDC 48 6 10 16 0.333 0.1359 0.1387 0.2679 0.2735
2019-20 — NCDC 49 17 14 31 0.633 0.2580 0.2580 0.5086 0.5086
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Nichols D3 CNE SR 18 4 2 6 0.333
2022-23 Nichols D3 CNE JR 24 5 6 11 0.458
2021-22 Nichols D3 CNE SO 24 4 1 5 0.208
2020-21 Nichols D1 CNE FR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Nichols D3 CNE FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
72%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15104
Forward overall
#661
Forward born in 2000
#488
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Gerbner
Plymouth State · 2015-16
0.524 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Brochu
Hamilton · 2013-14
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fritz Belisle
Augsburg · 2016-17
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.