← New Search ↗ Social Card

Fritz Belisle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-02-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 New Ulm Steel NA3HL 40 13 11 24 0.600 0.0753 0.0803
2016-17 New Ulm Steel NA3HL 44 26 24 50 1.136 0.1426 0.1448 0.3588 0.3644
2017-18 Minot Minotauros NAHL 55 9 5 14 0.255 0.0935 0.0911 0.2686 0.2618
2018-19 Minot Minotauros NAHL 58 17 15 32 0.552 0.2027 0.1885 0.5823 0.5414
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Augsburg D3 MIAC GR 26 5 13 18 0.692
2022-23 Augsburg D3 MIAC SR 28 5 12 17 0.607
2021-22 Augsburg D3 MIAC JR 29 16 10 26 0.897
2020-21 Augsburg D1 MIAC SO 4 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Augsburg D3 MIAC SO 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Augsburg D1 MIAC FR 25 3 3 6 0.240
2019-20 Augsburg D3 MIAC FR 25 3 3 6 0.240
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2019-20 · Augsburg
+87.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29489
Forward overall
#1453
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2022-23
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2023-24
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.