IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Ryan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-02-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Ottawa 67's OHL 65 1 7 8 0.123 0.0714 0.0742 0.3154 0.3276
2006-07 Ottawa 67's OHL 49 1 5 6 0.122 0.0710 0.0699 0.3136 0.3089
2007-08 Ottawa 67's OHL 62 1 4 5 0.081 0.0468 0.0438 0.2065 0.1932
2008-09 Ottawa 67's OHL 21 1 7 8 0.381 0.2211 0.1962 0.9763 0.8664
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Salve Regina D3 — JR 19 1 2 3 0.158
2009-10 Salve Regina D3 — SO 23 0 1 1 0.043
2007-08 Salve Regina D3 — FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#11647
Defenseman overall
#1281
Defenseman born in 1988
#1957
in OHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike McPherson
Plymouth State · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitchell Parsons
SUNY Brockport · 2017-18
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joey Martini
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.