| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001-02 | Navan Grads | CCHL | 51 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 0.157 | 0.0340 | 0.0372 | 0.1214 | 0.1328 |
| 2002-03 | Pembroke Lumber Kings | CCHL | 54 | 3 | 20 | 23 | 0.426 | 0.0924 | 0.0968 | 0.3295 | 0.3452 |
| 2003-04 | Pembroke Lumber Kings | CCHL | 52 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 0.173 | 0.0375 | 0.0374 | 0.1339 | 0.1336 |
| 2004-05 | Pembroke Lumber Kings | CCHL | 53 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.132 | 0.0287 | 0.0274 | 0.1022 | 0.0975 |
| 2005-06 | Pembroke Lumber Kings | CCHL | 59 | 4 | 21 | 25 | 0.424 | 0.0919 | 0.0836 | 0.3278 | 0.2982 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | Neumann | D3 | MAC | JR | 29 | 4 | 15 | 19 | 0.655 |
| 2007-08 | Neumann | D3 | MAC | SO | 25 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 0.360 |
| 2006-07 | Neumann | D3 | MAC | FR | 26 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.192 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.