← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charles Paterson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1985-04-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Navan Grads CCHL 51 1 7 8 0.157 0.0340 0.0372 0.1214 0.1328
2002-03 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 54 3 20 23 0.426 0.0924 0.0968 0.3295 0.3452
2003-04 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 52 1 8 9 0.173 0.0375 0.0374 0.1339 0.1336
2004-05 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 53 2 5 7 0.132 0.0287 0.0274 0.1022 0.0975
2005-06 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 59 4 21 25 0.424 0.0919 0.0836 0.3278 0.2982
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Neumann D3 MAC JR 29 4 15 19 0.655
2007-08 Neumann D3 MAC SO 25 1 8 9 0.360
2006-07 Neumann D3 MAC FR 26 0 5 5 0.192
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2006-07 · Neumann
+233.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19155
Defenseman overall
#1533
Defenseman born in 1985
#1524
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bethel · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Suffolk · 2018-19
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2018-19
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.