← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brock McBride Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-10-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Cornwall Colts CCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2002-03 Cornwall Colts CCHL 53 5 10 15 0.283 0.0904 0.1015 0.2191 0.2460
2003-04 Cornwall Colts CCHL 55 20 27 47 0.855 0.2728 0.2926 0.6615 0.7095
2004-05 Cornwall Colts CCHL 55 25 44 69 1.254 0.4006 0.4122 0.9711 0.9991
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SR 34 13 20 33 0.971
2007-08 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC JR 37 12 22 34 0.919
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.92
2007-08 · St. Lawrence
+194.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16746
Forward overall
#566
Forward born in 1986
#321
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2006-07
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Augsburg · 2014-15
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Middlebury · 2011-12
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.